VS
- Helio P35 Vs
- Helio P35 Review
- Helio P35 Vs Kirin 710f
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the MediaTek Helio G70 on one side and the MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.0GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8. Helio P35 We compared two 8-core processors: Mediatek Helio P60 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and MediaTek Helio P35 (IMG PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. Snapdragon 662 Helio P35 We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and MediaTek Helio P35 (IMG PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio P35 (with IMG PowerVR GE8320 graphics) and Helio P22 (PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
Single and multi-core processor tests
19
17
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
6
5
Efficiency of battery consumption
52
50
Overall chip score
25
23
Main differences and advantages of each chip
- 15% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2000 MHz)
- Announced 7-months later
- Higher GPU frequency (~5%)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksThe AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
100040
98688
CPU | 44240 | 39267 |
GPU | 11001 | 5607 |
Memory | 27983 | 25856 |
UX | 15002 | 14233 |
Total score | 100040 | 98688 |
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
170
155
974
752
Image compression | 66.55 Mpixels/s | 23.95 Mpixels/s |
Face detection | 9.05 images/s | 4.81 images/s |
Speech recognition | 16.55 words/s | 8.82 words/s |
Machine learning | 13.15 images/s | 5.31 images/s |
Camera shooting | 5.63 images/s | 2.51 images/s |
HTML 5 | 1.3 Mnodes/s | 0.59 Mnodes/s |
SQLite | 319.2 Krows/s | 150.25 Krows/s |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Helio P35 and Helio P22Architecture | 8x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
Transistor count | - | 5.5 billion |
TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
GPU name | IMG PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
Architecture | Rogue | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shading units | 64 | 64 |
FLOPS | 44.8 Gigaflops | 41 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenCL version | 1.2 | 1.2 |
DirectX version | 12 | 11 |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 14.9 Gbit/s | - |
Max size | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Neural processor (NPU) | No | CorePilot |
Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Max display resolution | 2400 x 1080 | 1600 x 720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 25MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 21MP, 2x 13MP |
Video capture | 1K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 1080p at 30FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265 | H.264, H.265 |
Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 7 |
5G support | No | No |
Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Announced | December 2018 | May 2018 |
Class | Low end | Mid range |
Model number | MT6765 | MT6762R |
Official page | MediaTek Helio P35 official site | MediaTek Helio P22 official site |
So, which SoC would you choose?
174 (75.7%)
56 (24.3%)
Total votes: 230
2.MediaTek Helio P35 and Samsung Exynos 9611
4.MediaTek Helio P35 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
6.MediaTek Helio P22 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
8.MediaTek Helio P22 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
10.MediaTek Helio P22 and MediaTek Helio G80
VS
We compared two 8-core processors: Mediatek Helio P60 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and MediaTek Helio P35 (IMG PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
Single and multi-core processor tests
26
19
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
12
6
Efficiency of battery consumption
49
52
Overall chip score
29
25
Main differences and advantages of each chip
- Performs 92% better in floating-point computations
- Shows significantly better (up to 71%) AnTuTu 8 score – 171K vs 100K
- Higher GPU frequency (~18%)
Pros of MediaTek Helio P35
- Announced 10-months later
- 15% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2000 MHz)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksThe AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
171210
100040
CPU | 68803 | 44240 |
GPU | 23779 | 11001 |
Memory | 24831 | 27983 |
UX | 32378 | 15002 |
Total score | 171210 | 100040 |
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
276
170
1129
974
Image compression | 77.3 Mpixels/s | 66.55 Mpixels/s |
Face detection | 11.2 images/s | 9.05 images/s |
Speech recognition | 17.1 words/s | 16.55 words/s |
Machine learning | 12.3 images/s | 13.15 images/s |
Camera shooting | 9.55 images/s | 5.63 images/s |
HTML 5 | 1.57 Mnodes/s | 1.3 Mnodes/s |
SQLite | 419.5 Krows/s | 319.2 Krows/s |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Helio P60 and Helio P35Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 8x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
GPU name | Mali-G72 MP3 | IMG PowerVR GE8320 |
Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 2 |
Shading units | 48 | 64 |
FLOPS | 86 Gigaflops | 44.8 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenCL version | 2.0 | 1.2 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Bus | 2x 32 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | - | 14.9 Gbit/s |
Max size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Neural processor (NPU) | No | No |
Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Max display resolution | 2340 x 1080 | 2400 x 1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 25MP, 2x 16MP |
Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265 |
Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 7 |
5G support | No | No |
Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Announced | February 2018 | December 2018 |
Class | Mid range | Low end |
Model number | MT6771 | MT6765 |
Official page | Mediatek Helio P60 official site | MediaTek Helio P35 official site |
So, which SoC would you choose?
86 (81.1%)
20 (18.9%)
Total votes: 106
2.Helio P60 or Snapdragon 665
4.Helio P60 or Snapdragon 662
Helio P35 Vs
6.Helio P35 or Snapdragon 675
Helio P35 Review
8.Helio P35 or Snapdragon 720G
Helio P35 Vs Kirin 710f
10.Helio P35 or Snapdragon 450